Tag Archives: wal-mart

Wal-Mart Tests “Scan & Go” iPhone app

Leave a reply

Keeping the Official Merchant Services blogs’ focus in the technology and mobile realm, today we take a look at the newest tech to be utilized by the retail giant Wal-Mart, which could potentially make the process of checking out more personal and faster.

Last week, Wal-Mart initiated testing of its new “Scan & Go” iPhone app in a Rogers, Arkansas supercenter near the company’s corporate headquarters.  Employees who had Apple Inc. iPhones were among the first to be able to test out the new app and it’s features in store.  The app allows customers to scan products as they shop and put them in bags in their carts. When it comes time to check out, the app transfers the scanned items to the self-checkout kiosk and the customer pays with conventional means (cash, check, or credit card).

The app does not allow users to pay on their phones yet.  However, we recently reported here that Wal-Mart had joined forces with other large retailers to begin creating a retailer-focused mobile wallet app called Merchant Customer Exchange, or MCX.  I expect to see some sort of integration between the “Scan & Go” app and the finished MCX product after it is unveiled.

The new system intends to skirt long lines at the retailers’ checkout counters, a widely held complaint of Wal-Mart shoppers.  Customers have even taken to Twitter to vent frustrations at times. The push to eliminate the need for cashiers and baggers could save Wal-Mart millions of dollars, said Chief Financial Officer Charles Holley.  The company spends about $12 million dollars in cashier wages every second at its U.S. Wal-Mart stores.

Wal-Mart’s iPhone app already includes functions such as letting shoppers create lists and seeing which items are in stock. Spokesman David Tovar said of the program, “We’re continually testing new and innovative ways to serve customers and enhance the shopping experience in our stores.”

This test comes as many retailers attempt new ways to speed up the checkout process and become innovators.  Wal-Mart declined to give details on where the test might lead, but it doesn’t seem a far leap to other mobile phone platforms (Android and Blackberry) as well as mobile payment options in the future.

Discover Teams Up with PayPal

Discover Teams Up with PayPal [2023 Update]

Leave a reply

The Official Merchant Services Blog continues to shine its spotlight of educational information directly on the Mobile Payments Industry. This bristling business sector keeps creating buzz among payment processing persons as well as overall economic assortments. One minute people are predicting hundreds of billions of dollars in revenue will get generated by consumers embracing the cashless society model and conveniently swiping their phones to pay for every little thing that catches their eye. The next minute people are predicting U.S. consumers are too wary and cautious and not ready to expose their information to the cloud and the criminals trying to crack their way into that cloud.

This titanic tug-of-war between “the next big thing” that economic analysts desperately desire M-Payments to become and the “hold your horses hombre” caution that those same analysts caveat the slow acceptance in U.S. markets has been defining the media coverage of the Mobile Wallet Madness for more than a year. But the potential for prodigious profits has pushed the possibilities of mobile payment processing through the morass of misgivings.

Merchants United!

As we purposely pointed out to our peerless readers just mere days ago, the Merchant Customer Exchange was formed. This epic assemblage of retail industry giants teams Wal-Mart Stores Inc., Best Buy Co. and Target Corp, 7-Eleven  Inc., Alon Brands Inc., CVS Caremark Corp., Darden Restaurants Inc., Lowes Co., Sunoco Inc., Sears Holding Corp. and the Publix Supermarket chains into a mega-group of retail merchant might on a mobile wallet mission.

Coming on the heels of Visa’s saturation of the 2012 London Olympics with all things Mobile and all things Visa, the mighty mingling of the MCX merchants applied unforeseen amounts of pressure on the mobile payment marketplace.

Mobile Payment Paring: Discover and PayPal

On August 22 PayPal, owned by eBay, announced a deal with Discover Financial Services to bring PayPal access to the 7 million merchants in Discover’s network. This deal will begin in the second quarter of 2013 and the announcement was made a mere two weeks after Square partnered up with Starbucks to let customers pay with Square’s app at the 7,000 U.S. Starbucks locations.

Excelsior! Retail titans are teaming up with mobile gadgeteers in one mass scramble to make it to market before the U.S. consumer becomes firmly affixed on the easiest and most widespread brand — as is wont to happen with U.S. shopper market behavior.

The PayPal deal is a particular point of note because PayPal itself is pushing from the online marketplace back into the physical realm of brick and mortar. This may indeed help bridge the gap from e-commerce to old fashioned commerce, and that bifrost of payment processing could very well buttress mobile payment processing in a brave new world of cashles-sness and contactless transactions.

The super-powered pairing of Discover and PayPal drove stock prices for each company, with Discover gaining 3.9% and eBay gaining 2.5% on the market the day the announcement was made. This arrangement will greatly accelerate PayPal’s in-store payment efforts. By riding on Discover’s network, PayPal can get into more locations  and get there quickly. Best of all this movement doesn’t requiring any significant integration work by merchants. That potentially puts PayPal at a big advantage against rival mobile payment systems such as Google Wallet, Isis, and Square.

Discover is integrating PayPal’s payment system into its software, which will be uploaded to millions of point-of-sale terminals that support Discover Card payments. PayPal’s branding and rules will be presented to consumers who choose to pay in store with PayPal. PayPal currently has more than 50 million U.S. customers who will be able to take advantage of in-store payments.

Don’t Call it a Comeback

Leave a reply

Today The Official Merchant Services Blog is here to update our readers on the latest development in the  lawsuit against Visa Inc., MasterCard Inc. —  the largest antitrust settlement in U.S. history. We broke the story last week when we revealed that the card companies agreed to pay more than $6 billion to settle lawsuits from retailers claiming that the card issuers engaged in anti-competitive practices.

The July 13 settlement still needs to be OK’d by a judge, and today we learned that the decision may be getting held up by plaintiffs who do not want the settlement and the money it brings.

The Opposition and Their Position

The National Association of Convenience Stores (NACS), a class plaintiff in the lawsuit, rejected the settlement offer according to their own website. Because the proposed settlement does not introduce competition and transparency into the broken credit card swipe fee market, the NACS Board of Directors unanimously rejected the proposed settlement agreement.

The settlement is the largest antitrust settlement in U.S. history, but NACS was not impressed because it only amounts to less than two months’ worth of swipe fees, based on the estimated $50 billion in swipe fees collected by the credit card companies on an annual basis. Worse, NACS feels that with the settlement there are no fundamental market changes that would constrain Visa and MasterCard from continuing to raise rates.

Wal-Mart Joins Opposition

The NACS opposition was announced almost immediately after the news of the settlement proposal was revealed. It’s taken a little bit of time, but others have started to join the opposition. Wal-Mart Stores Inc, the world’s largest retailer, joined the growing chorus of merchants opposed to the proposed settlement. Wal-Mart said the $7.25 billion settlement would not change a “broken” system of what credit card companies charge retailers for processing credit and debit card payments, known as “swipe fees.”

For the Record

NACS and Wal-Mart share the same criticism of the settlement.

“Not only does the proposed settlement fail to introduce competition and transparency into a clearly broken market, it actually provides Visa and MasterCard with the tools to continue to shield swipe fees from market forces,” said NACS Chairman Tom Robinson, who is also president of Santa Clara, Calif.-based Robinson Oil Corp.

Mirroring the NACS criticism, Wal-Mart said in a statement released by the company, “the proposed settlement would not structurally change the broken market or prohibit credit card networks from continually increasing hidden swipe fees, which already cost consumers tens of billions of dollars each year.”

Robinson also said, “this proposed settlement allows the card companies to continue to dictate the prices banks charge and the rules that constrain the market including for emerging payment methods, particularly mobile payments. Consumers and merchants ultimately will pay more as a result of this agreement — without any relief in sight.”

Wal-Mart again mirrored the NACS statements and went further when it said the settlement would not “prohibit credit card networks from continually increasing hidden swipe fees, which already cost consumers tens of billions of dollars each year,” and would “also constrain emerging payments innovation.” These innovations the opposition keeps referring to most likely include mobile wallets that allow consumers to pay using their smartphones.

Stay on Target

Joining Wal-Mart and NACS as vocal opponents of the settlement was Wal-Mart competitor Target. In a July 20 statement, Target used the now familiar language that the united opposition is using when it said in a statement that: “The proposed settlement would perpetuate a broken system, restrict retailers from any future legal action and offer no long-term relief for retailers or consumers.”

The NACS, Wal-Mart and Target were also joined by SIGMA, an association representing independent motor fuel marketers and chain retailers, in opposing this settlement. And then the National Grocers Association jumped on the anti-settlement bandwagon on July 27. “NGA joined the lawsuit on behalf of its independent retail grocer members over seven years ago to bring about real reform of the anticompetitive credit card swipe fee system,” said NGA president and CEO Peter Larkin in a statement. “This proposed settlement agreement fails in this regard by allowing Visa and MasterCard to continue their dominant anticompetitive practices.”

The Final Word

So as opposition mounts, it may be all for naught. The final decision still rests with a judge. It will be up to U.S. District Court Judge John Gleeson to approve or reject the settlement, a process that will play out in Brooklyn federal court over the next few months.