China made a surprising decision when they postponed Ant Group Co.’s IPO. The decision caused Hong Kong shares to plummet and made investors wonder about the financial future of the fintech company.
The postponement came after a meeting between one of Ant’s founder and Chinese regulators. The Shanghai Stock Exchange also removed the company from its listing. They claim it’s due to disclosure and listing condition issues that Ant Group can’t meet.
Why did it happen?
Jack Ma, a co-founder of Ant Group, openly told Chinese regulators that they were excessively risk-averse and it didn’t live much room for innovation. This move was a first for Chinese regulators, though, especially the night before such a large IPO release.
According to the Shanghai Exchange, recent changes in fintech regulatory may make it hard for Ant to pass the requirements. This mostly pertains to the information disclosure.
What Would the Changes Do?
The new regulations put the squeeze on Ant and many other fintech companies. Ant specifically would face new rules requiring them to have more cash reserves for the loans it offers. This would put more credit risk on the company.
Is that the reason Ant Group IPO was canceled? It’s yet to be determined. Some think it’s a power move by Beijing to remind Ma that they are in charge. The move was still drastic on China’s part as it hurts capital markets as a whole, but it could be a precedent they are trying to create.
A Detrimental Move for Ant Group
The move to pull Ant’s IPO cost them over $3 trillion in orders that were pending from retail investors between its two listings. In China alone, the listing would have brought the company $34.5 billion, making Ant worth $313 billion. This would have been one of the largest IPO releases in history.
As far as Ant Group is concerned, they feel they will rise above. They will continue to converse with regulators, figure out what they need to do, and come back stronger than ever.
On the last day of September, Durbin Amendment Eve if you will, The Official Merchant Services Blog is about ready to end its Countdown to Durbin Series. Today we take a look at the big news that has the media buzzing.
Bank of America Reacts to Durbin
Bank of America, the largest bank in the country going by deposits, announced it is going to begin charging its customers a $5 monthly fee to use debit cards. The bank will begin charging the fee next year for the bank’s basic checking accounts. It will apply only to debit card purchases and not to ATM withdrawals, online bill payments or mobile phone transfers, the company said.
Consumer Backlash and Cut Up Cards
Bank of America announced this change, which will take effect for its customers in 2012, and were soundly slammed with negative feedback. Our first link comes from Fox Business Network, where Gerri Willis cut up her debit card on the air in reaction to the news from Bank of America. “Right here, right now, I’m going to show Bank of America what I think of their fees,” she said before using a pair of scissors on her card.
Durbin Slams Bank of America
Our next link comes from The Washington Post. It picks up the topic, mentioning what Willis did on the air. It then offers Bank of America’s defense of this new fee, stating that the bank is doing this to recoup losses that will come from the cap on debit card swipe fees that the Durbin Amendment will put into place tomorrow on October 1. Then the article quotes Senator Dick Durbin: “Bank of America is trying to find new ways to pad their profits by sticking it to its customers,” Durbin said in a statement Thursday. “It’s overt, unfair, and I hope their customers have the final say.”
Bank of America Already in Crisis
While this move was quite predictable, and falls into line with Host Merchant Services’ previously published analysis of how banks will react to the Durbin Amendment, the news is quite incendiary because of Bank of America’s current situation. Which is mentioned in the third article we highlight on Bank of America, by Fox News: “the Bank of America decision drew outrage for several reasons. The company is the largest U.S. bank by deposits. And it reaped $45 billion in federal bailout money — receiving the first chunk in 2008 and the rest in 2009 to cope with losses at Merrill Lynch. “
The article also mentions that Bank of America did pay back the government all of the bailout money.
Bank of America a Microcosm of Durbin’s Impact
A fourth article, from the Christian Science Monitor, sums up quite succinctly how this news is quite standard Durbin Amendment fallout: “So in other words, Bank of America is shifting a part of the fee obligation from merchants to customers.”
As we’ve seen in the ongoing Countdown to Durbin series, this is one of the most expected moves that banks are making. Shifting the burden of the fees away from merchants and putting it squarely on the shoulders of the consumers. This avoids the scope of the Durbin Amendment’s regulations and lets the banks continue to reap profits from the billion dollar payment processing industry.
Rounding out the coverage of Bank of America and its announced monthly debit fees we find:
This chart, while the story states is not entirely tied to Bank of America’s recent announcement or to the Durbin Amendment, does show that banks will be affected by the Durbin Amendment. They will have to make changes to deal with the losses they expect to take from a hard cap on fees that they were profiting from, and if Bank of America is any indicator, the burden of those changes will go from the merchants who used to get hit with the swipe fees to the consumer who will now have to pay more to support the use of debit cards.
