Posted: January 17, 2025 | Updated:
When choosing a payment processing solution for your business, understanding the differences in pricing between top providers is essential. Selecting the right POS system is crucial for business owners, affecting everything from routine activities to profitability. Price typically plays a significant role in this choice.
In this comparison, we’ll break down the rates and fees for Clover vs Square in 2025, helping you determine which provider offers the best value for your business. We will examine their cost structures, transaction fees, and the overall benefits each offers. This will assist small businesses and businesses that are growing in identifying the ideal POS system tailored to their requirements.

Clover vs. Square offers distinct pricing structures for their POS systems, each tailored to various business needs.
Clover offers a range of POS solutions tailored to various business types, each with specific hardware and software configurations. Here’s an overview of the monthly pricing and key features for each plan:
When comparing Clover and Square, it’s essential to understand their processing fee structures, as these can significantly impact your business’s bottom line. Here’s a breakdown:
These rates indicate that Clover offers lower fees for standard in-person transactions than Square. However, Square provides more competitive rates for online and invoiced transactions.
Here’s a comparison of the POS systems offered by Square and Clover:

These are robust countertop POS systems where the Solo features a single display for the merchant, and the Duo includes an additional display for customer engagement. Both systems are equipped for payment processing, managing employees, and running customer loyalty programs.
This portable device accepts all major payment types, including contactless, chip, and swipe. It comes with a built-in receipt printer and barcode scanner, suited for businesses that need flexibility and mobility.
A more compact version of the Clover Station with similar features but in a smaller size. It uses cloud-based software, allowing remote access to business data.
A compact, mobile card reader that connects via Bluetooth to smartphones or tablets, supporting contactless, chip, and swipe payments. This reader is perfect for mobile businesses with minimal counter space.
This all-in-one POS system features separate displays for the merchant and customer, supporting various payment types such as contactless, chip, and magstripe. It is ideal for countertop sales.
A mobile, comprehensive device that processes payments, prints receipts and operates wirelessly. This device enables businesses to take payments anywhere on their premises.
This device converts it into a complete POS system by attaching to an iPad. It is compatible with specific iPad models and includes a rotating stand for easier customer interaction.
1. Magstripe Reader ($0 – $10): This small device connects to smartphones or tablets, facilitating swiped card payments. Square provides this reader for free to new users.
2. Contactless and Chip Reader ($59.00): This reader can process EMV chip cards and NFC payments such as Apple Pay and Google Pay, catering to various modern payment needs.
Square and Clover offer different approaches to setup, integration, and customization. Square’s hardware is designed for easy, plug-and-play use, requiring minimal setup, which makes it an attractive option for businesses looking for a quick deployment. On the other hand, Clover’s systems may involve a more involved setup, especially when integrating multiple devices or customizing features to fit specific business needs.
Clover offers a broader range of hardware options that can be tailored and scaled to accommodate growing businesses. In contrast, Square emphasizes simplicity and ease of use, making it more suitable for smaller companies or those that prefer straightforward solutions. Regarding pricing, Square is known for its transparent structure, charging per transaction without monthly fees for its essential POS software.
Clover typically involves hardware costs, including monthly software fees, depending on the chosen plan and hardware configuration. Ultimately, the decision between Square and Clover will depend on factors like the level of customization required, your budget, and how important mobility is for your business operations. Both systems provide reliable solutions, but the right choice will align with your needs.
Clover and Square offers a range of features tailored to diverse business needs. Here’s a comparison of their functionalities:
Both Clover and Square deliver comprehensive POS solutions with unique strengths. Clover’s flexibility in payment processing and 24/7 support may appeal to businesses seeking customizable options. At the same time, Square’s transparent pricing and integrated ecosystem are advantageous for those desiring an all-in-one solution.

Square and Clover offer user-friendly POS systems, but their setup processes and ease of use differ in key ways. Square is known for its quick and straightforward sign-up process, where businesses can quickly create an account by providing basic personal and company information.
Once the account is active, users can start accepting payments immediately. Square even provides a free magstripe reader to new users, allowing for quick transaction processing. Its intuitive dashboard has a built-in virtual terminal that supports keyed-in payments, real-time reporting, inventory management, appointment scheduling, and streamlining business operations. Square also offers extensive app integrations with platforms like WordPress, Wix, WooCommerce, and Shopify, as well as accounting and email marketing tools, offering businesses flexibility and scalability.
On the other hand, Clover’s setup process is more personalized, and users must enter their ZIP code to contact a Clover consultant or sales agent for assistance. While this can be beneficial, it may not be as convenient as Square’s self-service model. Clover’s dashboard includes robust features useful in restaurant settings, such as automatically syncing online orders with the kitchen to improve efficiency. However, Clover’s integrations with third-party apps are fewer than Square’s, potentially limiting flexibility for businesses requiring specific platform connections.
While Square’s self-service setup is quick and includes a broader range of integrations, Clover’s personalized setup support and specialized features may be better suited for businesses seeking tailored assistance and specific operational functions.
Square and Clover prioritize security and compliance to protect businesses and their customers during payment processing. Square takes a more hands-off approach by acting as the merchant of record, handling PCI DSS compliance on behalf of its users. This means businesses using Square are not responsible for managing PCI compliance, reducing the associated responsibilities. Square also employs end-to-end encryption and advanced tokenization to store customer data securely. At the same time, additional features such as two-step verification and customizable employee permissions help control account access.
On the other hand, Clover requires businesses to take an active role in managing their PCI compliance. Merchants using Clover must complete annual self-assessment questionnaires (SAQs) and may need to undergo security assessments. To assist with this, Clover offers resources like the Clover Security Plus program, which provides extra security tools and support for an additional fee. Clover also uses end-to-end encryption, providing security features like face and fingerprint identification for mobile app access. Tokenization is available through the Clover Security Plus program, further enhancing data protection.
Both Square and Clover comply with privacy standards such as the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) and the California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA), ensuring comprehensive data protection across various regulatory environments. When choosing a payment processing system, businesses should consider their ability to manage compliance responsibilities and the level of security support they need. Square offers a more streamlined compliance model, while Clover provides tools for businesses willing to take a more active role in managing security and compliance.
Clover and Square offer robust POS solutions with distinct advantages catering to different business needs. Square stands out for its simplicity, transparent pricing, and easy setup, making it an ideal choice for smaller businesses or those with less complex needs. On the other hand, Clover offers more flexibility, customizable features, and a broader selection of hardware, making it better suited for businesses looking for scalability and tailored solutions.
When deciding between Clover and Square, business owners should consider transaction fees, hardware preferences, ease of use, customer support, and security requirements. Square’s straightforward pricing and user-friendly interface may appeal to those who prioritize convenience. At the same time, Clover’s advanced features and range of hardware options might be more attractive to businesses with growing or specialized needs.
Ultimately, the best choice depends on the unique demands of your business, your budget, and the customization required to optimize your operations. Both systems provide reliable solutions, and with careful consideration, either can help drive business efficiency and growth in 2025.